|
The melancholy end of Miltiades, after his elevation to such a
height of power and glory, must often have been recalled to the minds of the ancient Greeks by the sight of one in particular of the memorials of
the great battle which he won. This was the remarkable statue (minutely described by Pausanias) which Datis, to form a trophy of the anticipated
victory of the Persians, had provided the Athenians, in the time of Pericles, caused to be hewn out of a huge block of marble, which, it was
believed. Phidias fashioned out of this a colossal image of the goddess Nemesis, the deity whose peculiar function was to visit the exuberant
prosperity both of nations and individuals with sudden and awful reverses.
This statue was placed in a temple of the goddess at Rhamnus, about
eight miles from Marathon. Athens itself contained numerous memorials of her primary great victory. Panenus, the cousin of Phidias,
represented it in fresco on the walls of the painted porch; and, centuries afterward, the figures of Miltiades and Callimachus at the head of
the Athenians were conspicuous in the fresco. The tutelary deities were exhibited taking part in the fray. In the background were seen the
Phoenician galleys, and, nearer to the spectator, the Athenians and the Plataeans (distinguished by their leather helmets) were chasing routed
Asiatics into the marshes and the sea. The battle was sculptured also on the Temple of Victory in the Acropolis, and even now there may be
traced on the frieze the figures of the Persian combatants with their lunar shields, their bows and quivers, their curved cimeters, their
loose trousers, and Phrygian tiaras.
These and other memorials of Marathon were the produce of the
meridian age of Athenian intellectual splendor, of the age of Phidias and Pericles; for it was not merely by the generation whom the battle
liberated from Hippias and the Medes that the transcendent importance of their victory was gratefully recognized. Through the whole epoch of
her prosperity, through the long Olympiads of her decay, through centuries after her fall, Athens looked back on the day of Marathon as the
brightest of her national existence.
By a natural blending of patriotic pride with grateful piety, the
very spirits of the Athenians who fell at Marathon were deified by their countrymen. The inhabitants of the district of Marathon paid
religious rites to them, and orators solemnly invoked them in their most impassioned adjurations before the assembled men of Athens. "Nothing
was omitted that could keep alive the remembrance of a deed which had first taught the Athenian people to know its own strength, by measuring
it with the power which had subdued the greater part of the known world. The consciousness thus awakened fixed its character, its station, and
its destiny; it was the spring of its later great actions and ambitious enterprises."
It was not indeed by one defeat, however signal, that the pride of
Persia could be broken, and her dreams of universal empire dispelled. Ten years afterward she renewed her attempts upon Europe on a grander
scale of enterprise, and was repulsed by Greece with greater and reiterated loss. Larger forces and heavier slaughter than had been seen at
Marathon signalized the conflicts of Greeks and Persians at Artemisium, Salamis, Plataea, and the Eurymedon. But, mighty and momentous as
these battles were, they rank not with Marathon in importance. They originated no new impulse. They turned back no current of fate. They were
merely confirmatory of the already existing bias which Marathon had created. The day of Marathon is the critical epoch in the history of the
two nations. It broke forever the spell of Persian invincibility, which had previously paralyzed men's minds. It generated among the Greeks
the spirit which beat back Xerxes, and afterward led on Xenophon, Agesilaus, and Alexander, in terrible retaliation through their Asiatic
campaigns. It secured for mankind the intellectual treasures of Athens, the growth of free institutions, the liberal enlightenment of the
Western world, and the gradual ascendancy for many ages of the great principles of European civilization.
EXPLANATORY REMARKS ON SOME OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE BATTLE OF
MARATHON, by its author: E.S. Creasy in 1851A.D.
Herodotus of the Persian cavalry taking any part in the battle says
nothing, although he mentions that Hippias recommended the Persians to land at Marathon, because the plain was favorable for cavalry
revolutions. In the life of Miltiades which is usually cited as the production of Cornelius Nepos, but which I believe to be of no authority
whatever, it is said that Miltiades protected his flanks from the enemy's horse by an abatis of felled trees. While he was on the high ground
he would not have required this defense, and it is not likely that the Persians would have allowed him to erect it on the
plain.
|